However to all motorists it well-known that the car - not only obvious convenience, but also the additional problems, which decision demands time and financial expenses. Certainly, to whom from drivers immemorial questions are not familiar: where to put, how to repair, than to fill, what to adjust, where to tint, what to draw in, where to weaken and to whom eventually it to sell.

Among all automobile questions not last place is occupied with mutual relations of the driver and the inspector. These two "categories" of people will surpass in degree of mutual hostility not only a cat with a dog, but even the son-in-law with the mother-in-law. It would Seem, why? Probably, the fault lies both on drivers, and on inspectors. The first that a sin to hide, often go on conscious infringement of Traffic regulations, and the second no means always differ awareness, politeness and the valid relation to the motorist.

Certainly, if to speak about it here вряд личто can help the reader. Here the questions, concerning are considered, how correctly it is necessary to behave to the motorist at a meeting with the inspector not to give itself in insult.

That tells the law ... I honour the Criminal code. It is my weakness. Остап Bendery There is no, probably, such driver who would not dream to put to the place of "the gone too far" inspector, to specify to it in scandalous lacks of work, and is possible, and to threaten with responsibility for abusing office position. However before to start "to stand up for the rights", not bad know, what standard documents regulate traffic questions in the Russian Federation, otherwise it is very easy to be trapped. And to lose similar dispute to the inspector - it almost always means to draw upon itself the whole lots of additional problems. Many wrongly believe that all questions of traffic including mutual relations of the driver and the inspector, are regulated only by Traffic regulations. Undoubtedly, this document is basic, however there are misunderstanding for which permission it is required to resort to other statutory acts. Also it is told about it in the given section. the Basic standard document, it is possible to tell, the Bible of the driver are Traffic regulations. With their help the overwhelming majority of disputes - yours with the inspector or participants of traffic among themselves, including is authorised at road accident. And what for me in general to stop? It appears, for a stop of a vehicle it is a lot of bases, and it is necessary to know about them

Check of documents? There are no problems! - What else documents? Moustaches, paws and a tail - here my documents! cat Matroskin So, having seen in front of the car a striped stick, you have obediently nestled on a roadside and have stopped, feverishly scrolling in a head a route in last 10 minutes. The inspector has approached and has said: "Check of documents!" How correctly to conduct itself in such situation, and it is told in the given theme. to be absolutely quiet, it is necessary to have at itself all documents which are provided item 2.1.1. Traffic regulations. First... If elementary forgetfulness, here a situation, in general, reparable became the reason of absence of documents. The inspector of traffic police has the right to give you possibility...

I am an infringer? More haste less speed. From that place where you go … So, you have broken Traffic regulations therefore have been stopped by the inspector and, having nestled on a roadside, is obedient wait, when the strict and severe employee of traffic police will approach. Here it has approached - and has begun: "why", "as so", "really you do not understand", "this full disgrace", "as is not a shame" and etc. In such situation it is necessary to remember that similar moralizing tone of the inspector is absolutely inadmissible, and about it is told in Manual item 18.7 on work of traffic police of traffic police of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation. Here it is directly told that the infringer about illegitimacy of its actions should give explanations without any morals, unambiguous and benevolent tone, necessarily resulting confirming to the words corresponding points of Traffic regulations or other statutory acts operating in sphere of traffic. Besides, remarks to the infringer in which car there are children, the inspector should do so that they did not hear it, otherwise you can tell strictly enough: "Excuse, not at children, please" - and or to leave the car, or if you already left, together with the employee of traffic police to depart from it far away. Undoubtedly, any situation on road including connected with infringement of Traffic regulations, depends on many factors: weather conditions (in bad weather it is easy not to notice a traffic sign), an unsatisfactory condition of a marking (the continuous line is almost erased that is why it is imperceptible) and etc. Here we will consider the most typical situations. When us stop for this infringement, in a head the thought is carried by: "Fur-trees-sticks, I have got", and, slowly nestling on the right roadside in that place where specifies a staff of the inspector, we feverishly start to invent justifications which could move to pity him or at least convince to apply to us only minimum sanctions. And very few people reflects... enough the situation when the inspector stops the driver who has made overtaking is widespread, and asserts that that has crossed a continuous line so - has broken Traffic regulations. in such situation it is possible to set pair вопросов:... a car Parking - one of the acute problems, concerning traffic, especially in big cities. In city centre to find a parking lot all becomes more difficultly and more difficultly, and it becomes frequent the reason of skirmishes Cотрудник the traffic police has no right to check a technical condition of a vehicle if it has when due hereunder taken place the state checkup about what at the driver of the coupon presence testifies to checkup passage. Especially it is necessary to stop on such nuance, as toning of glasses of the car Principal causes of insubordination to traffic sign requirements are known to all drivers: this or deliberate infringement of Rules, or the driver simply has not noticed a sign. And if in the first case your fault is obvious, in the second case it is possible to try to defend the rights. How to arrive if the inspector has stopped you and asserts, what you or your passengers have not been fastened by a seat belt? Often the inspector shows to the driver of the claim in infringement of requirements of a road marking (not there it was reconstructed or has crossed a continuous line), when it not very much and is visible As it is known, one of the gross infringements of Traffic regulations - journey on forbidding signal of a traffic light. It it is no wonder: the Crossroads and departure from adjoining territories is as speak in Odessa, two big differences. Imagine such situation: the end of summer, you take away the children from a summer residence and here the neighbour asks to bring to a city at the same time and its posterity. Who will refuse to the neighbour? Certainly - let go!

drunk at the wheel - the criminal! the Motorist have deprived of the rights for car driving in a drunk condition . That has disagreed and has brought an action . On court the inspector of traffic police represents itself as the witness and gives evidences: - The Citizen the judge! When I have stopped it and have approached to the car, he argued with mayor Luzhkov on a road condition in Moscow. - The Companion the inspector, it does not mean yet that the driver was drunk, and the mayor, probably, will confirm it. - Certainly, the citizen the judge, only the mayor nearby was not. Drunk at the wheel - a serious problem, and not only in the Russian Federation, but also in the majority of the CIS countries. Law enforcement bodies unsuccessfully try to overcome this problem throughout already many years. In spite of the fact that sanctions for driving in a state of intoxication severe enough, the great number of road and transport incidents because of drunk drivers every year is made. The most insulting that people who did not break Traffic regulations quite often suffer and quite обоснованно counted on their observance and other participants of movement. In spite of the fact that guilty of fulfilment of road and transport incident the drunk driver will be unequivocally recognised, all the same other participants of road accident will have superfluous problems: it is necessary to be engaged in the insurance, repair of the damaged car (it is especially insulting if the car has been bought recently or when car - basic source of the income), to restore health and etc. Not the secret that at the driver operating a vehicle in a drunken state (and it is unimportant - alcoholic or narcotic), considerably decreases reaction, is lost attention and ability to concentrate. Besides, practically any driver who is at the wheel in a state of intoxication, has a desire полихачить: to pass, as speak, with a breeze, to make an abrupt bend on turn, to overtake somebody in the forbidden place sharply to be reconstructed in the next number, "having cut" thus the driver of other vehicle, to ignore a red signal of a traffic light and etc. Similar actions the drunk driver endangers not only and the passengers who are in its car, but also other participants of traffic. Nevertheless some situations when the driver is suspected of driving in a state of intoxication, can accept ambiguous character. Similar subtleties also will be considered in the given theme. Friday evening, working week has ended, ahead two days off and you had an idea - whether to pass with friends on a liqueur glass of the drink undoubtedly containing alcohol? But here a question: where to go? Correctly - to organise "a business meeting at candles" in own car. And here in the heat... As it is known, inspectors of traffic police strictly enough concern the driver in which relation they had a suspicion that it operates the car in a state of intoxication. Therefore it is necessary to know accurately... So, you "have got"...

When I not the owner of own car

There is a muzhik along the street and sees: there is a tree, on a tree - "Zaporozhets", and in it the owner sits.
the muzhik asks: - Listen, what happens?
That answers:
- Besides that "Zaporozhets" - the car foolish so he also is afraid of dogs...

In life of any motorist, whether it be the beginning driver or the skilled professional, can arise situations when it will not be the high-grade owner of the car. More truly, legally the car will belong, of course, to the owner, but here to dispose of it at own discretion during any time it cannot. Such happens in two cases: at detention of a vehicle and by granting to its employees of corresponding bodies under their requirement according to the current legislation.

That such detention of a vehicle? On what basis can detain the car and whether you can challenge with deep arguments this decision?

As it is known, each driver should give the vehicle to employees of power structures, and also medical workers under their requirement in the cases established by the current legislation. However...

road accident. With me there was this misfortune … At a crossroads on red light there is heaped up "Mercedes". In full operation behind to it there drives "Zaporozhets". "Mercedes" leaves the healthy muzhik: - Listen, the grandfather, you tell to me only one: when I was not present, you as on red light You stop? Unfortunately, any driver in the world is not insured from road accident. This trouble can happen both with mere mortals, and with the mighty of this world (we will remember princess Diana, governor Evdokimova, etc.). Here we will consider, how it is necessary to behave, if on coincidence of circumstances you became the participant of road and transport incident. it is necessary to remember accurately: if with you there was such trouble, the most important thing - to try to keep endurance and calmness. And it is a question first of all not of an emotionality What there should be your first actions after the happened road and transport incident? in What image to stand for itself if the second participant of road accident obviously shifts blame on you though actually he has provoked incident, and employees of traffic police tend to to agree with its opinion? Each participant of road accident needs to know: all circumstances of failure should be accurately and are scrupulously fixed - on it will depend then very many.

It is useful and for knowing is interesting Car "Запорожец" - the kindest in the world a ghost with the motor! So, in the previous themes we have considered, how it is necessary to conduct myself to the driver in the most widespread situations which can arise at a meeting with the inspector of traffic police. However here it is impossible to consider in detail all variety of difficult and non-standard situations. In the given theme some nuances, concerning mutual relations of the driver and the inspector are short shined. For convenience of perception the material is stated in a mode "a question - the answer" . When the driver for the speed of 80 km/h makes arrival on any motionless obstacle, events develop the following образом:... you consider yourselves as the good driver, maybe, even the expert of driving? We bring to your attention the small test. Verify the answers with answers of those who really is the good driver, - drivers who went without road accident of hundred thousand kilometres. Help materials